Current Law Journal Content
Washington & Lee Law School
  Current Law Journal Content
                  an index to legal periodicals
 


  Biotechnology Law Report
  Volume 27, Number 1, February 2008
  homepage                   other issues
 

  • Paper
  • Patenting Neem and Hoodia: Conflicting Decisions Issued by the Opposition Board of the European Patent Office
        Kari Moyer-Henry
        p.1-10                                                                                    +cite        

  • Clinical Trials
  • Another Case of Gene Therapy-Associated Leukemia
        p.11                                                                                        +cite    

  • Patents
  • Glaxo Wins Preliminary Injunction; PTO Effort to Limit Continuations and Claim Numbers on Hold; Gardner Fails to Prove Prior Invention
        p.12-14                                                                                  +cite    

  • Patent Litigation
  • Will Biotechnology Companies Lose Ability to Restrict Production of Their Self-Replicating Products?; Merck Did Reveal Its Process and Is Not Guilty of Fraud; BLR Archives: AstraZeneca Coverage of Cardiovascular Drug Falls for Double Patenting
        p.15-20                                                                                  +cite    

  • Financial and Shareholder Affairs
  • Amgen Sued over G-CSF Royalties
        p.21                                                                                        +cite    

  • Science and Society
  • National Academy of Sciences Unimpressed by Analysis of Risk of Level 4 Biosafety Lab in Boston
        p.22-23                                                                                  +cite    
  • Bibliography
        p.24                                                                                        +cite    

  • Texts
  • Triantafyllos Tafas v. Jon W. Dudas et al., 1:07cv846 (JCC), Consolidated with SmithKline Beecham Corp. et al. v. Jon W. Dudas et al., 1:07cv1008 (JCC)
        p.25-35                                                                                  +cite    
  • Brief of Amicus Curiae, Biotechnology Industry Organization in Support of Plaintiffs' Motions for Summary Judgment, Triantafyllos Tafas and SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Dudas
        p.36-43                                                                                  +cite    
  • In re Harold R. Garner (Interference No. 105,455; 2007–1221)
        p.44-47                                                                                  +cite    
  • Brief of the Biotechnology Industry Organization as Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party, Quanta Computer, Inc. et al. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al.
        p.48-58                                                                                  +cite    
  • Brief of American Intellectual Property Law Association as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondent, Quanta Computer, Inc. et al. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al.
        p.59-70                                                                                  +cite    
  • Brief of Various Law Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent, Quanta Computer, Inc. et al. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al.
        p.71-78                                                                                  +cite    
  • In re Metoprolol Succinate Patent Litigation (2006–1254)
        p.79-89                                                                                  +cite    
  • Apotex Corp. v. Merck & Co., Inc. (2006–1405)
        p.90-93                                                                                  +cite    
  • Coming Events
        p.94-98                                                                                  +cite