Current Law Journal Content
Washington & Lee Law School
  Current Law Journal Content
                  an index to legal periodicals
 


  American Journal of Trial Advocacy
  Volume 29, Number 2, Fall 2005
  homepage                   other issues
 

  • ARTICLES
  • JACK AND JILL GO TO COURT: LITIGATING A PEER SEXUAL HARASSMENT CASE UNDER TITLE IX
        Susan P. Stuart
        p.243                                                                                      +cite        
  • GREAT GILMER'S GHOST: THE HAUNTING TALE OF THE ROLE OF EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION IN THE DISAPPEARANCE OF STATUTORY RIGHTS IN DISCRIMINATION CASES
        Kenneth F. Dunham
        p.303                                                                                      +cite        
  • GRAMMATICAL AND STRUCTURAL CHOICES IN ISSUE FRAMING: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF "QUESTIONS PRESENTED" FROM A HALF CENTURY OF SUPREME COURT BRIEFS
        Brady S. Coleman, Quy H. Phung, DéAnna Carlson, Shakeb Syed, Zahra Jivani
        p.327                                                                                      +cite        

  • TRIAL TECHNIQUES
  • CONVERSATIONAL CROSS-EXAMINATION
        Susan Rutberg
        p.353                                                                                      +cite        
  • THERAPEUTIC COMMUNICATION AS A TOOL FOR CASE THEMING
        Anthony L. DeWitt
        p.395                                                                                      +cite        
  • SETTLING THE LAW IN THE CIRCUITS: PRESENTING HEARSAY EVIDENCE IN A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING
        Michael J. Lichtenstein
        p.415                                                                                      +cite        

  • STUDENT COMMENTS
  • WEITZEL v. STATE OF MARYLAND: TURNING GRAY INTO BLACK AND WHITE--THE EVIDENTIARY ANALYSIS APPROACH TO PRE-ARREST SILENCE
        p.429                                                                                      +cite    
  • KELO v. CITY OF NEW LONDON, CONNECTICUT: ARE PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS REALLY IN DANGER?
        p.443                                                                                      +cite    
  • UNITED STATES v. PATTERSON: WHEN DOES THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE PROTECT DEFENDANTS IN FEDERAL COURT?
        p.467                                                                                      +cite    

  • RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
  • ARBITRATION LAW--McCAULEY v. HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.: THE COURT OF APPEALS' RESPONSE TO AN INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL FROM A DENIAL OF A MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
        p.481                                                                                      +cite    
  • ATTORNEY'S FEES--INVESSYS, INC. v. McGRAW-HILL COS.: SHOULD ELECTRONIC RESEARCH COSTS BE RECOVERABLE UNDER FEE SHIFTING STATUTES?
        p.487                                                                                      +cite    
  • BANKRUPTCY LAW--DEBTOR'S DUTY: THE HEIGHTENED NOTICE REQUIREMENT TO STUDENT LOAN CREDITORS AFTER IN RE HANSON
        p.491                                                                                      +cite    
  • CIVIL RIGHTS--JOHNSON v. MEADOWS: DOES THE EXHAUSTION REQUIREMENT OF THE PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT CONTAIN A PROCEDURAL DEFAULT COMPONENT?
        p.495                                                                                      +cite    
  • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--HARRY A. v. DUNCAN: DO PARENTS HAVE A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED INTEREST IN THE COMPANIONSHIP AND SOCIETY OF THEIR CHILDREN UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 1983?
        p.499                                                                                      +cite    
  • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--LOCKE v. DAVEY: STAT E-SPONSORED SCHOLARSHIPS AND THE SECTARIAN SCHOOL
        p.505                                                                                      +cite    
  • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--STATE v. HARNER: DRUG COURTS AND THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE
        p.511                                                                                      +cite    
  • EMPLOYMENT LAW--ETSITTY v. UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY: A NARROW INTERPRETATION OF TITLE VII
        p.515                                                                                      +cite    
  • HEALTH LAW--LOVE v. RANCOCAS HOSPITAL: APPLICABILITY OF THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT AND ACTIVE LABOR ACT TO INSURED AND UNINSURED PATIENTS
        p.521                                                                                      +cite